The Supreme Court and exclusionary zoning
Read Online

The Supreme Court and exclusionary zoning Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.

  • 437 Want to read
  • ·
  • 2 Currently reading

Published by Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service in [Washington, DC] .
Written in English


  • Discrimination in housing -- United States

Book details:

Edition Notes

StatementCharles V. Dale, Legislative Attorney
SeriesMajor studies and issue briefs of the Congressional Research Service -- 1976-78, reel 1, fr. 0756
ContributionsLibrary of Congress. Congressional Research Service
The Physical Object
Pagination27 p.
Number of Pages27
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL15449420M

Download The Supreme Court and exclusionary zoning


a| Introduction / June Manning Thomas and Marsha Ritzdorf -- The racial origins of zoning in American cities / Christopher Silver -- Locked out of paradise: contemporary exclusionary zoning, the Supreme Court, and African-Americans: present / Marsha Ritzdorf -- The second ghetto and the 'infiltration theory' in urban real estate, / Raymond Mohl -- Family values, . Exclusionary Rule. The principle based on federal Constitutional Law that evidence illegally seized by law enforcement officers in violation of a suspect's right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures cannot be used against the suspect in a criminal prosecution.. The exclusionary rule is designed to exclude evidence obtained in violation of a criminal defendant's Fourth . Exclusionary Zoning and the Mount Laurel Doctrine: A Selective, Lightly Annotated Bibliography of Secondary Sources [compiled by Paul Axel-Lute, Fall ] Scope and Arrangement This is a bibliography of secondary sources—i.e. commentary and analysis--only. It includes published books, but not governmental reports or archival materials. Get this from a library! The Supreme Court and exclusionary zoning: Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.. [Charles V Dale; Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service.].

  Editor's Note: Special Thanks to Pace Law Professor John R. Nolon for posting his summary here: Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District U.S. Supreme Court U.S.___ () J Brief and Analysis John R. Nolon - Professor of Law Pace University School of Law Introduction: Prior to this case, courts did. Exclusionary zoning. One well-documented problem is exclusionary zoning. Often, government land use regulations (generally local) don’t permit housing—and/or require such large lot sizes, large square footage per dwelling, and/or other high-end features —in such widespread areas of the jurisdiction, that low- and moderate-income people.   The judge pointed out that the Supreme Court had struck down racial zoning, which explicitly segregated cities based on race, only a few years before; this new form of zoning, which set aside. THE PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT AND EXCLUSIONARY SUBURBAN ZONING: FROM BILBAR TO GIRSH - A. DECADE OF CHANGE. I. INTRODUCTION. Since , when the United States Supreme Court, in the landmark decision of Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.,' upheld the constitu-.

Following Euclid’s appeal, in the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling overturning Westenhaver’s decision. The landmark opinion in Euclid . Virginia's racial zoning movement got underway in as soon as the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals upheld the constitutionality of Richmond's act to regulate the height and arrangement of buildings Virginia's enabling legislation allowed cities to zone their entire area according to race, whereas the Baltimore plan applied only to all-File Size: KB. The supreme court, race, and civil rights Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: / Fair Housing Issues in the Contexts of Exclusionary Zoning and Street Closings; not previously addressed by the Supreme Court. The book concludes with Chapter 5, on the Rehnquist Court era (–). The Michigan Supreme Court recently held that a township’s denial of an application for rezoning at a proposed lower-density level does not automatically establish that its exclusionary zoning challenge to the township’s ordinances is ripe, or that it would be futile for the developers to apply for a higher-density use.